PermitPipeline

San Francisco Preconstruction Activity Index

Building-permit applications by neighborhood and permit type, with issuance timing.

Edition: September 2026 · covering June–August 2026 · data extracted September 28, 2026

SF index, June–August 2026
113.1
6,492 applications vs 5,742
San Francisco monthly building-permit applications, both permit systemsSan Francisco monthly building-permit applications, both permit systems from 2024-08 to 2026-08. Range 1,448 to 2,193; highest in 2026-06 at 2,193; most recent month 2026-08 at 2,143. The three highlighted bars are the months in the current index window.2024-08: 1,9162024-09: 1,8402024-10: 1,8932024-11: 1,4482024-12: 1,4702025-01: 1,6882025-02: 1,6772025-03: 1,7662025-04: 1,9102025-05: 1,8402025-06: 1,9082025-07: 1,9352025-08: 1,8992025-09: 1,8972025-10: 2,0372025-11: 1,6402025-12: 2,0052026-01: 1,7252026-02: 1,6702026-03: 2,0302026-04: 1,9172026-05: 1,8862026-06: 2,1932026-07: 2,1562026-08: 2,1432025-012025-072026-012026-07
San Francisco monthly building-permit applications, both permit systems, August 2024 to August 2026. Highlighted bars are the current index window.

Two permit systems

San Francisco has been moving routine permit types out of the Department of Building Inspection's legacy system and into PermitSF, a new online portal published as a separate open dataset. The legacy data alone would show June–August applications at 78.6; from the September 2026 edition the index counts both systems. Over-the-counter fire-alarm and fire-sprinkler work is left out of both years, because PermitSF now issues it as a fire permit rather than a building permit. Leaving out stopped-and-refiled PermitSF applications and solar and energy-storage applications as well, the index would read 110.7.

Moved to PermitSFPermit types
February 10, 2026In-kind door, window and siding replacements; fire alarms; fire sprinklers
June 22, 2026Reroofing; signs and awnings
July 14, 2026Electrical; plumbing and mechanical
September 14, 2026Kitchen and bath remodeling
Applications, June–August20252026
Legacy DBI system, all applications6,2834,937
Less over-the-counter fire-alarm and fire-sprinkler work−541−66
Plus PermitSF building permits01,621
Index universe5,7426,492

How the two systems were checked against each other is set out in the methodology.

Applications by permit category

By permit category, over-the-counter permits were 92.8% of June–August 2026 applications and rose 15.7% (5,211 to 6,027); type 3 additions, alterations and repairs, the category routed through full plan review, fell 7.1% (254 to 236). These are the city's permit categories, not project sizes. Over-the-counter permits are reviewed and approved at the permit counter, and they include large commercial interiors: 81 legacy over-the-counter applications in June–August 2026 declared $1 million or more (63 a year earlier), against 23 type 3 applications (22 a year earlier). Declared values are applicants' own estimates, present on 78% of legacy over-the-counter applications (88% a year earlier), and PermitSF records are not included. An index is not shown where the year-earlier count is under 50.

Permit category, June–August20252026IndexShare of 2026
Over-the-counter permits5,2116,027115.792.8%
Type 3: additions, alterations or repairs25423692.93.6%
Signs and awnings24910743.01.6%
Type 9 (solar and energy storage)793—1.4%
Types 1, 2, 5 and 6: new construction, demolition, grading2129—0.4%
All building-permit applications5,7426,492113.1100%

August applications by permit type

CategoryAug 2025Aug 2026
Over-the-counter alterations (DBI system)1,7411,349
Plan-reviewed additions/alterations/repairs8486
Sign - erect541
Permit type 9 (no published definition; descriptions are solar and energy-storage work)730
Wall or painted sign40
Demolitions37
New construction (wood frame)35
New construction22
Grade/quarry/fill/excavate11
Door, window and siding replacements (PermitSF)0270
Reroofing (PermitSF)0364
Signs and awnings (PermitSF)028

Issuance timing

Over-the-counter permits are reviewed and approved at the permit counter, usually within days, while type 3 permits are routed through full plan review, which takes months, so the two are timed separately. Times are elapsed calendar days from filing to issuance among permits issued in August; they include the applicant's own time and leave out applications still waiting. Over-the-counter permits are measured across both permit systems, sign and awning permits excluded. Corrected September 28, 2026: the September 2026 edition's figures included 12 PermitSF sign permits and read 39.6% the same day.

Measure (permits issued in August)20252026
Over-the-counter permits, median days0 days2 days
Over-the-counter permits issued same day57.5%39.9%
Type 3 permits (full plan review), median172 days206 days

Declared value, type 3 permits (full plan review)

PercentileAug 2025Aug 2026
25th$31,451$40,000
Median$149,810$150,000
75th$366,844$420,000
Filings8486
Declared at $1 (placeholder)79
Median excluding $1 (sensitivity)$161,254$175,000

Neighborhoods

All 41 San Francisco Analysis Neighborhoods are listed. 29 filed more applications than a year earlier. The mover rule requires at least 50 applications in the prior-year window, so the 8 smallest areas cannot qualify however they moved. One of them, Presidio (1 to 3), has the largest percentage increase in the city. Read any "N of 33" comparison as covering only the screened areas.

Neighborhood20252026IndexMeets 50-application screenPasses mover rule
Sunset/Parkside504581115.3yesyes
Financial District/South Beach474559117.9yesyes
West of Twin Peaks375486129.6yesyes
Mission319363113.8yesyes
Outer Richmond319330103.4yes—
Noe Valley241248102.9yes—
Inner Sunset228247108.3yesyes
Castro/Upper Market227241106.2yes—
Pacific Heights216240111.1yesyes
Bayview Hunters Point20119597.0yes—
Marina201226112.4yesyes
Bernal Heights173258149.1yes—
Inner Richmond17015591.2yes—
Excelsior160189118.1yes—
Haight Ashbury140145103.6yes—
Glen Park1199680.7yes—
Potrero Hill115133115.7yesyes
Chinatown11410188.6yes—
Oceanview/Merced/Ingleside111131118.0yes—
Nob Hill110142129.1yesyes
Russian Hill109146133.9yes—
Lone Mountain/USF1089184.3yes—
Presidio Heights105143136.2yesyes
Hayes Valley102119116.7yes—
South of Market99125126.3yesyes
Outer Mission9598103.2yes—
Western Addition80102127.5yesyes
Portola797594.9yes—
Tenderloin717098.6yes—
North Beach70111158.6yesyes
Mission Bay624369.4yes—
Twin Peaks5473135.2yesyes
Seacliff5261117.3yes—
Visitacion Valley4975153.1——
Lakeshore464393.5——
Japantown3237115.6——
Treasure Island78114.3——
McLaren Park2150.0——
Golden Gate Park11100.0——
Lincoln Park11100.0——
Presidio13300.0——

Full table: SF neighborhoods (CSV)

Row-level extracts

The rows behind every table on this page, re-pulled from the city's open-data API with the same filters the edition used, for anyone who wants to check a figure against the source. A fresh pull differs from the frozen edition by a handful of records because the city back-dates its own file; the reconciliation extract lists every headline figure both ways, with the delta, rather than hiding it. Same CC BY 4.0 licence as the tables.

Extracts: legacy-system applications, June to August, both years (fire-work flag) (CSV) · PermitSF building permits, June to August, with neighborhood (CSV) · legacy-system permits issued in August, both years, with days filed to issued (CSV) · electrical permits by month (companion series) (CSV) · PermitSF building permits issued in August, with days submitted to issued (CSV) · electrical permits filed in August, both years (legacy system) (CSV) · PermitSF electrical permits filed in August (CSV) · duplicate audit: every PermitSF permit flagged, with the application it matched (CSV) · fire-filter audit: every legacy application the two keyword rules treat differently (CSV) · reconciliation: published figure, fresh pull, delta (CSV) · manifest: pull time, dataset, exact query per file (CSV)

The PermitPipeline Preconstruction Activity Index is published by Josh Steinman, founder of PermitPipeline. Underlying data: NYC DOB NOW Job Application Filings and San Francisco building permits (deduplicated) and PermitSF permits. See the methodology, the Firm Directory, and why we publish this research.